Which risk level should be configured for sign-ins that originate from IP addresses with dubious activity?

Which risk level should be configured for sign-ins that originate from IP addresses with dubious activity?

• A. None
• B. Low
• C. Medium
• D. High

Answer: (C)

When evaluating risk levels for sign-ins that originate from IP addresses exhibiting dubious activity, selecting a medium risk level is appropriate. This classification reflects a balanced approach where the risk does not reach a critical threshold, but is still significant enough to warrant attention and possibly further verification steps. The medium risk level suggests that while the sign-in attempts may not be outright malicious, there are indicators that require caution. Such an assessment allows organizations to implement necessary security measures such as monitoring, additional authentication challenges, or even temporary access restrictions. This level of scrutiny is essential to protect systems and data without overwhelming users with overly stringent security measures. In contrast, setting the risk level to none or low could lead to a false sense of security, potentially leaving systems vulnerable to real threats. A high-risk classification could result in unnecessary alarm and disruption for legitimate users, as it may impose severe restrictions or lockout scenarios. The medium classification therefore represents a prudent balance, indicating notable concerns without escalating to a panic response.

When evaluating risk levels for sign-ins that originate from IP addresses exhibiting dubious activity, selecting a medium risk level is appropriate. This classification reflects a balanced approach where the risk does not reach a critical threshold, but is still significant enough to warrant attention and possibly further verification steps.

The medium risk level suggests that while the sign-in attempts may not be outright malicious, there are indicators that require caution. Such an assessment allows organizations to implement necessary security measures such as monitoring, additional authentication challenges, or even temporary access restrictions. This level of scrutiny is essential to protect systems and data without overwhelming users with overly stringent security measures.

In contrast, setting the risk level to none or low could lead to a false sense of security, potentially leaving systems vulnerable to real threats. A high-risk classification could result in unnecessary alarm and disruption for legitimate users, as it may impose severe restrictions or lockout scenarios. The medium classification therefore represents a prudent balance, indicating notable concerns without escalating to a panic response.